Subscribe to Jansen Subscribe to Jansen

 

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  

Dennis Jansen

Scalia = legal Rick James?

During statutory interpretation:

Professor M: “Scalia points to the conference history and admits ‘yeah that’s inconsistent with what I’m saying but I’m Scalia and I don’t care about legislative history…’


The topic is the Scalia dissent in Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Cmtys. for a Great Or., 515 U.S. 687 (U.S. 1995)

No comments yet to Scalia = legal Rick James?

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>