Scalia = legal Rick James?

During statutory interpretation:

Professor M: “Scalia points to the conference history and admits ‘yeah that’s inconsistent with what I’m saying but I’m Scalia and I don’t care about legislative history…’


The topic is the Scalia dissent in Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Cmtys. for a Great Or., 515 U.S. 687 (U.S. 1995)

0 thoughts on “Scalia = legal Rick James?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>