Subscribe to Jansen Subscribe to Jansen

 

July 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jun    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Uh, You shoulda told us…

Hill v. Jones* was assigned for contracts. The key question is whether a seller of a house has an obligation to tell the buyers about previous termite infestations.

At one point the sellers argue, essentially, “But we thought the termites were dead!”

The court responds:

“Although sellers have attempted to draw a distinction between live termites and past infestation, the concept of materiality is an elastic one which is not limited by the termites’ health.”

Pwned. The whole misrepresentation/non-disclosure doctrine appears similar to the “lies of omission” that gets so many of us in trouble in elementary school…

Parent: “I thought you did your homework!”
Child: “I only said that I did my English homework.”
Parent: “You’re so grounded. Shoo.”

* Hill v. Jones, 725 P.2d 1115 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>